WASTE RECYCLING CAMPAIGN IN
GOLDEN FISHER’S LEARNING SCHOOL
___________________________________
Project-Based Learning
Presented to
AVA CLARE MARIE M. ROBLES, Ph.D
MSU – Graduate School
General Santos City
___________________________
In Partial Fulfilment
of the Requirements in SE 204
Instructional Strategy
for Science and
Math Teachers
_____________________
by
FAYE KATHREEN O. TELEN
March 24, 2012
Chapter I
THE PROBLEM
Introduction
The mounting garbage is an eyesore. But
there is an even more harmful effect of the garbage – Mother Earth is grieving.
Pollution around caused by trash, which because they are thrown haphazardly
without following proper waste disposal. These garbage become toxin producers
that harm the environment.
Garbage is
food waste such as excess foods and ingredients – spoiled and no longer fit for
human consumption. Food wastes are decomposable and do not really need to be
thrown in the bin, it can be turned into useful organic fertilizer.
Some people’s
reason for improper handling of garbage and rubbish is the absence of regular
garbage collectors in their locality but there are other ways to minimize
wastes that is produced in the households.
Because waste
disposal is one of the growing problems worldwide and is directly connected to
industrial development and population growth, individuals and community
officials are now continuously looking for solutions to address this problem.
Based on the EMB
study, only about 73% of the 5,250 metric tons of waste generated daily are
collected by dump trucks hired by our respective local government units. That
is assuming our LGUs are faithful to their duties to us, taxpayers. The
remaining 27% of our daily waste or about 1,417.5 metric tons end up in canals,
vacant spaces, street corners, market places, rivers and other places where,
ironically, there’s a sign that reads “HUWAG MAGTAPON NG BASURA DITO. ANG
MAHULI, BUGBOG SARADO!”
Segregation of wastes is very
important. This is the gauge to proper waste disposal which is done by men can
make the environment free from toxins and pollution.
Statement of the Problem
The researcher aimed to find out the
level of awareness of the pupils in Golden Fisher’s Learning School with regards
to proper waste segregation and recycling. Specifically,
the researcher sought answers to the following queries:
1.
What
are the common garbage in the school and their ways to dispose it?
2.
What
is the level pupil’s awareness on proper waste segregation and recycling?
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES AND
ACTION PLAN
This study pertains to the various reading on literature and
studies which
is related to the recent study.
Solid Waste Management
The regulatory foundation for solid
waste management in the Philippines is the Ecological Solid Waste Management
Act of 2000 (RA 9003) and its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR). This
act was enacted in order to provide an institutional basis for a national
program that would manage the control, collection, transport, processing and
disposal of solid waste in the Philippines. An important result of RA 9003 was
the creation of the National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC) which is
intended to oversee the implementation of local solid waste management plans
and to develop policies aimed at achieving the objectives of the act.
RA 9003 provides specific development
and design criteria and allocates responsibility for various elements of an
integrated solid waste management program. In combination with the requirements
of the Local Government Code (RA 7160), the responsibility for solid waste
management service delivery is placed primarily on the LGUs who have been
struggling with developing the technical and financial capacity required to
fulfill their responsibilities defined in RA 9003. This places the solid waste
management service provision responsibility on the provinces, cities,
municipalities, and barangays throughout the country and also forms the basis
for much of the solid waste management technical assistance provided to
EcoGov2’s client LGUs.
A key provision of RA 9003 mandates
waste diversion and recovery through the establishment of material recovery and
composting facilities. These are intended to complement ongoing (mostly
informal) segregation, collection, recovery and processing activities. The RA
9003 waste diversion baseline calls for a minimum diversion rate of 25% which
is the target minimum performance by LGUs for the first five year period
following the development of their Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM)
plans.
RA 9003 further stipulates that the
diversion rate shall increase every three years after the initial five-year
period. As a result of this requirement, many LGUs have developed materials
recovery and composting facilities to achieve the mandated diversion rate.
Throughout the world, the common solid waste management hierarchy that serves
as the basis for ISWM development places a strong emphasis on source reduction
and recycling/diversion prior to disposal. In many cases, however, waste
diversion programs are developed as voluntary programs where local governmental
agencies work toward achieving a target result. These programs are often driven
by a strong economic driver because of the high value of scarce or diminishing
landfill capacity. This is primarily the case in the United States and the
European Union where land has been unavailable or disposal area development or
strong opposition to proposed disposal sites has hindered their development. As
available landfill airspace has diminished, its economic value has dramatically
EcoGov2 UEM Program Assessment increased thereby providing a strong economic
driver for any program that physically decreases the amount of solid waste that
requires disposal.
In the Philippines, RA 9003 requires
that all LGUs achieve a mandated 25% waste diversion rate. The mandatory aspect
of waste diversion programs in the Philippines will be important in assuring
that the target rate is ultimately met by LGUs. However, this also assumes that
the required diversion target performance under RA 9003 is ultimately enforced
and that LGUs recognize that they have no option but to develop and sustain
programs that accomplish the diversion rate objective. Based on the
observations made during the assessment field work, it appears that many LGUs
have developed materials recovery and composting facilities.
However, there is some question as to
whether these facilities are being operated to the intended level of diversion.
During the assessment field work, it was noted that there are indications of a
strong economic base for source separation, recovery and recycling of some
solid waste components already exists. The consultant believes that the
existing market base for recycled materials (as substantiated by the extent of
the "junk shops" observed in the site visit areas) demonstrates that
potentially viable markets exist for various types of recovered materials.
(EcoGov2 has already undertaken an study of market conditions for recyclable materials in
Mindanao which identifies markets for recovered solid waste components and the
economic conditions by which these markets exist.)
In the future, a further market assessment
should be considered to determine whether further market development will be
required to meet the needs of all of the recycling and recovery initiatives
that are apt to occur as a result of the RA 9003 mandated diversion rate. In
addition, greater detailed evaluation of market conditions for various
recovered materials may provide a basis by which support can be provided to
encourage further market development so as to enhance the economic conditions
that help drive waste diversion success.
RA 9003 requires that all LGUs in the
Philippines prepare 10 year ISWM plans to serve as the basis for complying with
the act’s requirements and for implementation of their programs. As of the end
of 2003, most LGUs in the Philippines had organized Solid Waste Management
Boards and many had prepared or were preparing their ISWM Plans. Since it began
its solid waste management activities, the EcoGov2 program has provided
assistance to an extensive number of provinces, cities, municipalities, and
barangays with the aim of assisting them in the preparation of their ISWM
plans. This has been a key element of the EcoGov2 UEM program to date.
Both RA 7160 and RA 9003 place the
responsibility formanagement of solid waste directly on the LGUs. As is the
case in many countries, the responsibility for some environmental sectors is
often fragmented. The consultant believes that this is the case in the
Philippines. To be effective, a solid waste management program must closely
coordinate the activities of all major participants. For example, solid waste
collection and waste diversion initiatives at the Barangay level should be
closely coordinated to those undertaken by the municipal and city LGUs. Closer
coordination can assure that an economy of scale is realized particularly in
terms of dealing with recovered materials markets and in the development of
clustered disposal areas that are in compliance with RA 9003.
Waste Prevention
Waste prevention as a strategic element
in the European waste policy is becoming increasingly important. It is clear
that in Europe the amount of waste generated is growing every year, and it is
growing faster than economic growth. Since one of the main goals of the EU is
to secure economic growth and prosperity, it is imperative to de-couple the
relationship between economic growth and the generation of waste. Waste
prevention initiatives address both the industrial sector, by promoting the use
of cleaner technology, as well as schools and private households etc.in broader
awareness campaigns. As prevention has the highest priority in the EU waste
management principles, efforts should be made in order to aim at reducing the
quantity of waste generated. Two terms are often commonly used in this respect:
‘waste prevention’ and ‘waste minimization’.
a definition of waste minimization and prevention was agreed. As it
appears in the figure below, waste minimization is a broader term than
prevention. Waste prevention covers ‘Prevention’, ‘Reduction at source’ and
‘Re-use of products’. Waste minimization, however, also includes the waste
management measures ‘quality improvements’ (such as reducing the hazardous
substances) and ‘recycling’.
Figure 1.Strategic Plan
PREVENTIVE MEASURES
|
WASTE MANAGEMENT MEASURES
|
||||||
Prevention
|
Reduction at source
|
Re-use of products
|
Quality improve-ments
|
Recycling
|
Energy recovery
|
Pre- treatment
|
|
WASTE MINIMISATION
|
|||||||
Proposition
- The
pupil’s poor attitude and perceptions about solid waste management have
contributed to the problem.
Definition of Terms
Waste
Minimization Plan: A
systematic strategy for the proper management, handling and disposal of wastes,
with a particular emphasis on the opportunities for waste minimization.
Waste
Minimization: Waste
minimization comprises any activity to prevent or reduce the volume and/or environmental
impact of waste that is generated, treated, stored or disposed of.
Waste:
Waste is an undesirable or
superfluous by-product, emission or residue of any process or activity that has
been discarded, accumulated or been stored for the purpose of discarding or
processing. Waste products may be gaseous, liquid or solid or any combination
thereof, and may originate from domestic, commercial or industrial activities,
and include sewage sludge, radioactive waste, building rubble, as well as
mining, metallurgical and power generation waste.
Chapter III
METHODOLOGY
This chapter
covers the respondents, instruments, procedures and
statistical treatment used in the study.
Respondents
The
respondents of the study were the 21 Grade 1 pupils of GFLS.
Table 1
Distribution of Student-Respondents in GFLS
Level
|
Population
|
Grade 1
| 21 |
TOTAL
|
21
|
Procedure
The
researcher will ask permission from the principal of the school to conduct
herstudy.
When approved, the researcher will
coordinate with the advisers for the administration of the questionnaire. She
will personally distribute the questionnaires to the students and retrieve
after answering them.
Strategy and Action
plan
SHORT-TERM PLAN
|
|||
Action Issue:
|
Starting a Recycling Program
|
Grade Level:
|
Kinder
– Grade 1
|
Goal
|
Create
a brand new recycling program.
|
||
Over-all Strategy
|
Put
a bin in every classroom and coordinate volunteers to take the garbage to the
recycling area.
|
||
Total Campaign
Length
|
4
weeks
|
||
WEEK
|
FOCUS
|
WEEKLY
ACTION ITEMS
|
TIPS
|
1
|
Educate
yourself
Examine
your trash
Make
contact
|
·
Research how recycling helps
the environment and saves energy.
·
Examine the contents of
your trash
·
Delegate Leadership to the
Grade 1 Pupils
·
Reach out to the principal,
teachers and other lower levels.
|
We make sure that we are delegating responsibility
to build leadership longer.
|
2
|
Recruit
Volunteers
Write
it out
|
·
Recruit volunteers to help with
the project
·
Create a recycling project
·
Designate a bin to hold
recycled materials and collect the materials regularly.
|
We
need to hold up the focus and maintain the momentum of the volunteers.
|
3
|
Educate
your peers
Think
outside the trash bin
|
·
Launch the educational Campaign
·
Assess how the program is going
·
Expand out, putting more bins
in the classrooms.
|
Make a program or an activity that
would attract the pupils to join the campaign.
|
4
|
Push
to the Limits
|
·
Handout buttons or stickers
with a recycling logo to the pupils who witness the recycling.
·
Expand the amount of bins in
every classrooms.
|
Everyone loves stickers always. They
are maybe better than flyers for getting the words out.
|
Beyond
|
Build
your Movement
|
Possible
next step:
·
Find a garbage collection unit
·
Expand to other types of trash
·
Build on with a 6 month
campaign to reduce the waste in the school campus.
|
Take
a break! But still take hold of your campaign.
|
Chapter
III
CONCLUSION
AND RECOMMENDATION
The regulatory foundation for solid
waste management in the Philippines is the Ecological Solid Waste Management
Act of 2000 (RA 9003) and its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR). This
act was enacted in order to provide an institutional basis for a national
program that would manage the control, collection, transport, processing and
disposal of solid waste in the Philippines.
Because of this, the Golden Fisher’s
Learning school with their Kindergarten and Grade 1 pupils aim to create a new
recycling program to help the management in maintaining cleanliness. By
following the action plan, the pupils have made its way to educate their school
mates about the basic ways to reduce and recycle the garbage accumulated in the
school campus that last for a month. And to make this plan work out for the
whole duration, the volunteers launch a campaign with different activities to
motivate other pupils to join them. One way is by designating trash bins in
each classrooms and handout buttons or
stickers with a recycled logo.
For this to be effective, it etter
to widen the scope of the campaign to the nearest community.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
“Building the Basis
for a Common Understanding on Waste Minimisation”, OECD Workshop October 1996
in Berlin.
Velez,
Angela and Catlin, Kate. Trash Your Trashiness: Action Plan for Waste Reduction and Recycling
Implementation
Larochelle, Leo R., P.E. Philippines
Environmental Governance 2 Urban Environmental Management Program Assessment
Freduah,
George. Problems of
Solid Waste Management in Nima, Accra
DOCUMENTATIONS
